• Gallery
  • Browse by Category
  • Videos
  • Top Rated Articles
  • Public TimeLine
  • News RSS Feeds
  • Chief Editor : Manilal B. Par |  Executive Editor : Bipul A. Singh
  • After insulting Rajnath Singh, Pakistan must re-learn the virtue of being a good host
    After insulting Rajnath Singh, Pakistan must re-learn the virtue of being a good host editor editor on Friday, August 5, 2016 reviews [0]
    India's home minister Rajnath Singh goes to Pakistan as a guest and comes back insulted — his speech censored, hotel surrounded by protesters and official luncheon ruined by a sulking government taking dictation from a banned terror outfit.
    With its churlish behaviour, Pakistan ended up doing exactly what it wanted to avoid: Giving publicity to the Indian home minister's words, denying him media space. Singh's speech is now almost everywhere, it is being quoted by international agencies, talked about in India and, to Pakistan's misfortune, being debated in its own country.
    Under normal circumstances, Singh's address to the Saarc leaders would have passed off as a normal speech. But the controversy and curiosity around it has given it a life and legend of its own.
    The entire episode reminds us of the story of Hanuman's visit to Ravana's Lanka. Eager to spite the messenger, the demon king sets Hanuman's tale on fire and ends up burning down his own capital.
    File image of Home Minister Rajnath Singh. AFPFile image of Home Minister Rajnath Singh. AFP
    During Singh's visit to Pakistan for the Saarc summit, Islamabad acted almost like a B-team of Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief and outlawed terrorist Hafiz Saeed, following the agenda he had set. As if to ensure Saeed was not seen as a paper tiger, the Pakistani government allowed protesters to camp near Singh's hotel and turn it effectively into a staging area for protests.
    Ensuring the safety of a diplomatic guest, keeping miscreants away is a standard protocol all hosts follow during VIP visits. It would be pertinent to point out to Pakistan here that India, like a gracious host, goes out of its way to ensure Tibetan protesters do not get any opportunity to ruin a visiting Chinese premier's visit. But Pakistan, obviously, had a different plan in mind: It wanted to use Singh's visit as a propaganda tool for its Kashmir lobby.
    Speaking at the Democratic National Convention, US First Lady Michelle Obama offered an interesting punchline while taking down Donald Trump: When they go low, we go high.
    To Singh's credit, he decided to visit Pakistan in spite of threats of mass protests by Saeed. Once India had taken the decision, it was Pakistan's responsibility to behave like a good host, if not a gracious neighbour. It is a shame it didn't. Not attending the lunch was a new low. Speaking at a press conference, Pakistan's interior minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said he had received a message from the Indian minister asking whether he (Nisar) would be coming to the lunch. The interior minister said he excused himself as he had to attend an important meeting at the prime minister's residence.
    This, from a country whose leaders gorge on biryani in our country even during personal visits.
    The Pakistani media, while debating Singh's walkout, has imparted to a different spin to the story. It claims the Indian home minister walked out in a huff after losing a war of words with Chaudhry. The Indian minister indirectly accused Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism. But when Chaudhry responded — after relinquishing his position as the chairman of the meeting — Singh found it difficult to digest, claimed Dawn.
    That is like saying Hanuman walked out of Lanka with his tail burnt. Singh had gone there with the specific purpose of speaking his mind on the issue of terrorism sponsored by Pakistan. Once he had done that and in the process set the house on fire, it made no sense to endure Pakistan's usual litany of explanation and ''our freedom fighter-your terrorist" spiel.
    Finally, before we forget Pakistan's insolence and impudence, let us get this off our chest: What does the Indian government intend to do to ensure such acts are not repeated?
    In 2013, when then Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif compared his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh with a dehati aurat, Narendra Modi retorted in trademark style: "How dare you (Sharif) address my nation's prime minister as a village woman? There cannot be a bigger insult of the Indian Prime Minister," Modi said during a rally in New Delhi, adding, "We can fight with him (Manmohan) over policies, but we will not tolerate this. This nation of 1.2 billion will not tolerate its prime minister's insult."
    This country of 1.2 billion should not tolerate the home minister's insult either.

    » Not yet reviewed by any member. You can be the first one to write a review.
    » You must be logged in to post a comment